Blab Music
Major Record Labels Propose Chart Rules for AI-Generated Music
A coalition of major and independent record labels has unveiled a set of guidelines that would decide whether music created with generative artificial intelligence (AI) can qualify for official music charts. The proposal, submitted in early 2026, represents the latest industry effort to set clear boundaries around AI‑assisted recordings.
The coalition, which includes Sony Music, Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, Mom+Pop Music, Partisan Records, Dirty Hit, Concord, BMG, Believe, and HYBE, says the new framework will let chart compilers and other industry bodies differentiate between tracks that are primarily human‑made and those that are largely generated by AI. Under the guidelines, a recording would only be eligible for chart consideration if it is deemed to be “substantially human‑made.” The proposal also requires that any AI tools used in the creative process be properly authorised and lawful, that the recording complies with copyright and personality‑rights legislation, and that it does not raise concerns about artificial streaming or chart manipulation. In addition, the use of AI must be clearly disclosed to listeners on digital streaming platforms in line with emerging industry labelling standards.
The standards come at a time when AI‑generated music is becoming a significant portion of streaming libraries. Deezer, for example, reported that by June 2026 more than half of its daily uploads were fully AI‑generated tracks, with a monthly average of roughly 90,000 such songs arriving each day. The rapid growth of generative AI tools—such as text‑to‑music models that can produce backing tracks or full songs from prompts—has made it easier for producers and independent artists to create music at scale. Generative AI, a subfield of artificial intelligence that uses large neural networks to generate new data, has seen widespread adoption across entertainment, marketing, and creative industries.
For chart compilers, the proposal offers a consistent framework to assess the role of AI in contemporary recordings. The coalition argues that the standards will enable official charts to recognise responsible AI‑assisted creativity while continuing to celebrate human artistic contribution. The guidelines also address potential manipulation of streaming numbers, a concern that has surfaced as some AI‑generated tracks are uploaded in bulk to inflate play counts.
While the standards have been formally submitted for consideration, it remains unclear whether major chart publishers—such as Billboard, the Official Charts Company, and other national chart organisations—will adopt them. If implemented, the rules would represent one of the most significant attempts yet to define how AI‑assisted music fits within the traditional chart ecosystem.
At present, the industry is monitoring the coalition’s proposal closely. Chart publishers are expected to review the guidelines and determine whether they align with existing chart eligibility rules. The outcome will influence how AI‑generated tracks are catalogued, streamed, and promoted in the coming years. Until a decision is made, artists and labels can continue to use AI tools, provided they meet the criteria outlined by the coalition and disclose AI involvement where required.
The proposal highlights the growing need for clear policies around AI in music. As generative AI tools become more sophisticated and widespread, the industry will need to balance innovation with legal and ethical considerations. The next few months will likely see further dialogue between labels, chart organisations, and regulators as the music business adapts to the evolving landscape of AI‑generated content.
The coalition, which includes Sony Music, Universal Music Group, Warner Music Group, Mom+Pop Music, Partisan Records, Dirty Hit, Concord, BMG, Believe, and HYBE, says the new framework will let chart compilers and other industry bodies differentiate between tracks that are primarily human‑made and those that are largely generated by AI. Under the guidelines, a recording would only be eligible for chart consideration if it is deemed to be “substantially human‑made.” The proposal also requires that any AI tools used in the creative process be properly authorised and lawful, that the recording complies with copyright and personality‑rights legislation, and that it does not raise concerns about artificial streaming or chart manipulation. In addition, the use of AI must be clearly disclosed to listeners on digital streaming platforms in line with emerging industry labelling standards.
The standards come at a time when AI‑generated music is becoming a significant portion of streaming libraries. Deezer, for example, reported that by June 2026 more than half of its daily uploads were fully AI‑generated tracks, with a monthly average of roughly 90,000 such songs arriving each day. The rapid growth of generative AI tools—such as text‑to‑music models that can produce backing tracks or full songs from prompts—has made it easier for producers and independent artists to create music at scale. Generative AI, a subfield of artificial intelligence that uses large neural networks to generate new data, has seen widespread adoption across entertainment, marketing, and creative industries.
For chart compilers, the proposal offers a consistent framework to assess the role of AI in contemporary recordings. The coalition argues that the standards will enable official charts to recognise responsible AI‑assisted creativity while continuing to celebrate human artistic contribution. The guidelines also address potential manipulation of streaming numbers, a concern that has surfaced as some AI‑generated tracks are uploaded in bulk to inflate play counts.
While the standards have been formally submitted for consideration, it remains unclear whether major chart publishers—such as Billboard, the Official Charts Company, and other national chart organisations—will adopt them. If implemented, the rules would represent one of the most significant attempts yet to define how AI‑assisted music fits within the traditional chart ecosystem.
At present, the industry is monitoring the coalition’s proposal closely. Chart publishers are expected to review the guidelines and determine whether they align with existing chart eligibility rules. The outcome will influence how AI‑generated tracks are catalogued, streamed, and promoted in the coming years. Until a decision is made, artists and labels can continue to use AI tools, provided they meet the criteria outlined by the coalition and disclose AI involvement where required.
The proposal highlights the growing need for clear policies around AI in music. As generative AI tools become more sophisticated and widespread, the industry will need to balance innovation with legal and ethical considerations. The next few months will likely see further dialogue between labels, chart organisations, and regulators as the music business adapts to the evolving landscape of AI‑generated content.
