Blab Music
IFPI and RIAA Launch Voluntary AI-Music Labels to Clarify Streaming Content
When a new wave of AI‑generated songs floods playlists, the industry is turning to labels.
On Thursday, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) announced a voluntary system that will mark tracks as either "AI‑Generated" or "AI‑Assisted." The move, backed by a coalition that includes the American Association of Independent Music (A2IM), the Worldwide Independent Network (WIN), IMPALA, SAG‑AFTRA, the Grammys and the Human Artistry Campaign, aims to give listeners an immediate understanding of how a song was created.
The proposed standard is simple: a track that is produced entirely from AI prompts, or that features AI‑generated lead vocals or key instrumental parts, receives the "AI‑Generated" tag. If AI is used only as a supporting tool while a human performer supplies the core of the performance, the track is labeled "AI‑Assisted." The labels would be embedded in the song’s metadata and could be adopted by digital music services worldwide.
AI‑generated music is already a sizable part of the streaming ecosystem. Deezer reports that more than 44 % of all daily uploads to its platform are AI‑generated, equating to roughly 75,000 new tracks each day. Apple Music has said that over a third of the music it delivers to users is "100 % AI." The sheer volume has raised questions about royalty payments, editorial placement and consumer transparency.
Deezer has responded by automatically tagging fully AI‑generated tracks it detects and filtering those songs out of royalty calculations and editorial playlists. The company also launched a free online AI music detector that lets users check whether any track in their personal playlists – even on rival services – was created with AI.
Tidal has taken a similar stance. Last month it announced that tracks it identifies as wholly AI‑generated will no longer earn royalties or be eligible for direct‑to‑fan sales, though the songs will remain available to listeners.
"Fans want to know whether and how generative AI has been used in the music to which they listen," said IFPI chief executive Vikki Oakley in a joint statement with RIAA chair and CEO Mitch Glazier. "The labels would provide an immediately understandable and easily scalable approach to transparency." Oakley added that the system would allow consumers to make informed choices without adding complexity to the listening experience.
WIN CEO Noemí Planas highlighted the importance of trust in the ecosystem. "For artists and fans around the world, true connections and trust are everything," she said. "Clear labeling of AI‑generated content gives fans the transparency they deserve and supports the human‑centered, safety‑first approach that the global independent community has championed through the WIN Principles for Generative AI."
The initiative remains voluntary, and major streaming platforms have yet to commit to adopting the labels. Industry observers note that without widespread platform participation, the system’s impact could be limited. Nevertheless, the backing of major trade bodies provides a strong institutional foundation.
If the labels are embraced, they could influence royalty calculations, editorial curation and consumer choice. By distinguishing between fully AI‑generated and AI‑assisted tracks, the industry seeks to address concerns about the dilution of human artistry and the potential for AI content to be monetized without appropriate compensation for creators.
The launch of the labeling system is a significant step in the broader effort to regulate generative AI in music. While the labels are not yet mandatory, the collaboration among IFPI, RIAA and other stakeholders signals a coordinated approach to a rapidly evolving technology landscape.
The industry will watch how streaming platforms respond and whether the voluntary labels gain traction. If the system is adopted widely, it could set a precedent for other media sectors grappling with AI‑generated content.
In the coming months, the IFPI and RIAA will likely engage with platform partners to discuss implementation details. The outcome of these discussions will determine whether the labels become a standard feature of music metadata and how they shape the future of music distribution and consumption.
On Thursday, the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry (IFPI) and the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) announced a voluntary system that will mark tracks as either "AI‑Generated" or "AI‑Assisted." The move, backed by a coalition that includes the American Association of Independent Music (A2IM), the Worldwide Independent Network (WIN), IMPALA, SAG‑AFTRA, the Grammys and the Human Artistry Campaign, aims to give listeners an immediate understanding of how a song was created.
The proposed standard is simple: a track that is produced entirely from AI prompts, or that features AI‑generated lead vocals or key instrumental parts, receives the "AI‑Generated" tag. If AI is used only as a supporting tool while a human performer supplies the core of the performance, the track is labeled "AI‑Assisted." The labels would be embedded in the song’s metadata and could be adopted by digital music services worldwide.
AI‑generated music is already a sizable part of the streaming ecosystem. Deezer reports that more than 44 % of all daily uploads to its platform are AI‑generated, equating to roughly 75,000 new tracks each day. Apple Music has said that over a third of the music it delivers to users is "100 % AI." The sheer volume has raised questions about royalty payments, editorial placement and consumer transparency.
Deezer has responded by automatically tagging fully AI‑generated tracks it detects and filtering those songs out of royalty calculations and editorial playlists. The company also launched a free online AI music detector that lets users check whether any track in their personal playlists – even on rival services – was created with AI.
Tidal has taken a similar stance. Last month it announced that tracks it identifies as wholly AI‑generated will no longer earn royalties or be eligible for direct‑to‑fan sales, though the songs will remain available to listeners.
"Fans want to know whether and how generative AI has been used in the music to which they listen," said IFPI chief executive Vikki Oakley in a joint statement with RIAA chair and CEO Mitch Glazier. "The labels would provide an immediately understandable and easily scalable approach to transparency." Oakley added that the system would allow consumers to make informed choices without adding complexity to the listening experience.
WIN CEO Noemí Planas highlighted the importance of trust in the ecosystem. "For artists and fans around the world, true connections and trust are everything," she said. "Clear labeling of AI‑generated content gives fans the transparency they deserve and supports the human‑centered, safety‑first approach that the global independent community has championed through the WIN Principles for Generative AI."
The initiative remains voluntary, and major streaming platforms have yet to commit to adopting the labels. Industry observers note that without widespread platform participation, the system’s impact could be limited. Nevertheless, the backing of major trade bodies provides a strong institutional foundation.
If the labels are embraced, they could influence royalty calculations, editorial curation and consumer choice. By distinguishing between fully AI‑generated and AI‑assisted tracks, the industry seeks to address concerns about the dilution of human artistry and the potential for AI content to be monetized without appropriate compensation for creators.
The launch of the labeling system is a significant step in the broader effort to regulate generative AI in music. While the labels are not yet mandatory, the collaboration among IFPI, RIAA and other stakeholders signals a coordinated approach to a rapidly evolving technology landscape.
The industry will watch how streaming platforms respond and whether the voluntary labels gain traction. If the system is adopted widely, it could set a precedent for other media sectors grappling with AI‑generated content.
In the coming months, the IFPI and RIAA will likely engage with platform partners to discuss implementation details. The outcome of these discussions will determine whether the labels become a standard feature of music metadata and how they shape the future of music distribution and consumption.
